Bisexuality Isn't Really Complecated
Bisexuality has been the subject of chatter lately, since the New York Times Magazine ran a cover story
on the quest to prove it exists. There was a time when I used to dread
this topic. I’m one of those people who, when pressed, identifies as bi,
but far more often says I’m gay. And I’m not alone: When surveyed, a majority of LGB people say they’re “B,” but how many self-identified bisexuals do you know? Most Americans have gay or lesbian friends and associates, but many fewer seem to have bisexual ones that they know of, despite their statistical ubiquity among LGB people.
Why don’t bisexuals like me come out more? Part of it is laziness.
But you don’t find many gay or straight people identifying as something
other than who they really are just because they’re lazy. Part of it is
stigma. As discussed in (and, some say, perpetuated by) the Times Magazine
piece, bisexuals get little respect, not only from the world at large,
but specifically from gays and lesbians, some of whom have long insisted
they don’t exist. There is a widespread belief that those who identify
as bi are either in a transitional stage or are lying (to themselves or
others)—trying to savor the status of straightitude while enjoying the
pleasures of gaydom. And this suspicion of the enduring reality of
bisexuality contributes to “bisexual erasure,” which the Times piece defines as “the idea that bisexuality is systematically minimized and dismissed.”
Comments
Post a Comment